Francis Coppola's Creative Signature in Apocalypse now

-

 AUTEUR AND APOCALYPSE NOW

Francis Coppola's auteur style is very contrasting to other directors. 'The Godfather' was one of his first major hit films that portrayed his distinctive style and were then seen in his other films. 

Visual Style:

- Spectacle and lavish Production design, Theatrical mise-en-scene + stagey set-pieces captured in long takes.

- Long tracking shots.

- Chiaroscuro lighting ( especially at the end of Apocalypse Now when Kurtz was at the compound).

- Imaginative use of sound and music.

- Eisensteinien montages (during the opening and closing sequences of Apocalypse Now - cross-cutting and parallel editing).

- Ironic Parallel Montage ( helicopter attack scene, murders at the end of 'The Godfather').

- Mixture of elaborately designed and planned set pieces with handheld improvisation.

Narrative:

- Anti Heroes, Outsiders, Cold professional men

- Antihero: a central character in a story who is not traditionally brave or heroic. In this instance, Captain Willard. 

- Epic narratives

- The 'American Dream' and family

- Mostly film about men, women are side-lined and barely on screen

- The search for the possibility of hope, for escape

- The journey through 'the wilderness' - critics of systems (socio-economic, racial, ethnicity, etc and inequality. )

Control: independent producer:

- Independence: Coppola owned the independent production studio: Omni Zoetrope

- Multitasking: For Apocalypse Now, Coppola directed and produced the movie as well as co-writing the music with his father Carmine Coppola.

- Financial Independence: After the success of 'The Godfather' part II, he had a lot of power in Hollywood however still struggled to finance Apocalypse Now (for example the set being destroyed by a typhoon)

- Much of the financing came from his own pocket (approx. $19 million), no one told him what to do, he was in charge.

- Creative Freedom: He's an auteur because for much of his career he was able to make any films he wished to make

- in the 70s this was because of his success with 'The Godfather' and 'The Godfather' part II which won 9 Oscars ( Apocalypse Now won 2 Oscars )

- Coppola put everything he owned on the line, by also going to horrible places in which there was a very strong possibility that he would not return. Essentially Coppola sold his sanity in order to get this film done.

- "My film is not a movie; it's not about Vietnam. It is Vietnam. It's what it was really like; it was crazy. We were in the jungle, there were too many of us, we had access to too much money, too much equipment; and little by little, we went insane."

- The film is an allegory for the Vietnam war. Not just in the story but also in the way it was made.

 Coppola's Auteur Counter Arguments:

- Coppola's period of artistic genius only lasted from 1972 - 1978

- He has only made four truly great films: 'The Godfather', 'The Godfather' part II, 'The Conversation' and 'Apocalypse Now' ('The Conversation' was the only one he actually willingly wanted to make)

- His 80s films mostly flopped and in the 90s he was just a director of hire. Nearly all of his films since Apocalypse Now have been critical and financial failures. 

- Some could argue that he isn't really an auteur, but others could say he has a reputation for being an auteur

( - Hitchcock's argument is for the auteur theory and Coppola is an argument against it.)



                                                       


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why is the short film "Wallace & Gromit" engaging?

-
Image
      Wallace and Gromit: The Wrong Trousers How is it engaging?  The director of Wallace and Gromit successfully makes the film engaging to the audience by using several different filmmaking techniques. For instance, he uses the stages of Todorov's Narrative Theory which assists the audience in understanding the story and the plot of the film in an organized and structural manner. According to this theory, the film will start with an equilibrium which in this case is Wallace and Gromit peacefully living together and having breakfast in the morning. This is greatly highlighted through the soft chill music in the background of the scene.    Next is an action or character disrupting the equilibrium which is the penguin's arrival and him taking over Gromit's role in the home. This disruption is shown through the way the music changes upon his arrival and becomes eerie, immediately emphasising how the penguin is a threat; essentially acting as a warning to the ...
Read more

No Country For Old Men: Opening Scene

-
Image
 NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN In the opening sequence, we are introduced with a voiceover of a mysterious character who we don’t know yet, however, it is evident that he’s going to be a significant character in the movie. Diegetic sounds are clearly used such as the sounds of the police officer and the closing of the police car door, as well as the sound of the protagonist placing an object on the front seat of the car. The non-diegetic sounds of the wind blowing softly emphasize the isolation of the setting and atmosphere, which as a result, makes the placement of the characters strange. The lack of soundtrack during the killing of the policeman illustrates the lack of importance of the character’s death, mirroring the lack of empathy the main character has. Moreover, Chigurh's first dialogue is threatening along with his expression. His voice is monotone and he slightly smiles as he shoots the police officer. This gives the audience the impression that he also may be a psychopath....
Read more

The Grandmother: Analysis

-
Image
 THE GRANDMOTHER  DAVID LYNCH How does David Lynch turn these ordinary aspects of life into surreal nightmares? Being born: - Jittery and twitchy movements in a stop motion manner - The parents come in straight up while the child comes in sideways, which could symbolise him being born in the wrong place and may not fit in - Aggressive and violent movements may be foreshadowing how the boy's parents will treat him during the film - We only hear animal noises, which makes the film seem animalistic. It may also be a representation of how newborn children perceive the world and are still unable to comprehend words - Barking and crawling, which is inhumane Growing up: - The boy is mostly been neglected by his parents - Sorrowful and isolating atmosphere - Grey undertones with an overall dark ambience, which makes the environment seem cold - Pasty white colour that consumes their faces made vivid by the high contrast film making the boy seem sickly. Also, the red lipstick suggests t...
Read more